Skip to main content

What is a good CSAT score?

Measuring content By 9 min read All posts

The short answer

A good CSAT score, counted as the share of 4 and 5 answers on a 1 to 5 scale, is about 70% to 85% in published benchmarks: Survicate's 2025 median was 80.0%, and SurveyMonkey's guide calls 70% to 85% good. Only compare with CSAT benchmarks calculated the same way, because an average rating out of 5 or an ACSI score out of 100 is a different number. The benchmark you can act on is your own score, asked the same way, over time.

Search for "good CSAT score" and you get figures from the mid-70s to almost 90, sometimes for the same industry. Most of that gap comes from method: what was asked, on which scale, who answered, and whether the number is a share of satisfied answers, an average or an index.

CSAT benchmarks: 80% is the median, and 70% is ordinary

These figures come from survey vendors, from their own customers' surveys.

Published figures, 2025 and 2026 data
BenchmarkFigureWhat the number isSource
All surveys, median80.0%Share of 4 and 5 answers (top of the scale on other scales), 1,259 surveys, 2025Survicate (vendor data)
All responses87.8%3.5 million responses collected through the tool in 2025; method not stated on the summary pageSimplesat (vendor data)
"Good" range70% to 85%Share of satisfied answers; the guide does not say where the ranges come fromSurveyMonkey (vendor guide)

Survicate's report covers 1,259 CSAT surveys from 370 companies. Half of them scored between 64.8% and 90.0%, so a score of 70% sits well inside the normal range. Simplesat's 2026 report puts its benchmark at 87.8%, but its summary page does not say which answers count as satisfied. Use a benchmark only if it says what it counted and divided.

Check whether a benchmark is a share or an average

Most tools ask "How satisfied were you with...?" on a 1 to 5 scale, then turn the answers into a score in one of two ways:

  • Share of satisfied answers: count the 4s and 5s, divide by all answers and multiply by 100. SurveyMonkey and Survicate both define CSAT this way, and the CSAT calculator reports it first.
  • Average rating: add up every answer and divide by the number of answers, for a score out of 5. Microsoft Copilot Studio, for example, reports a satisfaction score "out of 5" from the average of its CSAT answers.

Take 100 answers: 50 fives, 30 fours, 10 threes and 10 ones. The share is 80% and the average is 4.1, so a benchmark of "4.3" and one of "85%" cannot be put side by side. The two also move differently: if the readers who gave 1 start giving 3, the average rises and the share stays at 80%, because a 3 is still not a 4.

Scales add another layer. SurveyMonkey and Survicate count 5 to 7 as satisfied on a 7-point scale and 6 to 10 on a 10-point scale, so half the points count on a 10-point scale against two of five on a 5-point one. Report the share of 4 and 5 answers as your CSAT, put the average beside it, and only compare 1 to 5 scores with other 1 to 5 scores.

Never compare your CSAT with an ACSI score

The ACSI publishes satisfaction scores for US industries and companies that look a lot like CSAT figures: scores out of 100 that read like percentages. They are a different kind of number.

An ACSI score is an index. A US government report that used the ACSI method (prepared by CFI Group for US Citizenship and Immigration Services) describes it as a weighted average of three questions: overall satisfaction, satisfaction compared with expectations, and satisfaction compared with the ideal. Each is answered on a 1 to 10 scale, and the result is converted to a 0 to 100 scale for reporting.

So an ACSI score of, say, 75 means the weighted answers sit three quarters of the way up the scale, not that 75% of customers were satisfied. It is closer to an average rating than to a share of 4 and 5 answers.

The mix-up is common because both numbers tend to land in the 70s and 80s. SurveyMonkey's CSAT guide, for example, uses ACSI industry scores as its industry benchmarks and writes them with a percent sign. If an industry benchmark comes from the ACSI, leave it out of any comparison with your share of 4 and 5 answers.

A good CSAT score depends on industry and placement

Even with the same calculation, scores vary a lot by industry. Survicate's 2025 medians:

  • Manufacturing and logistics: 93.0%
  • Retail and wholesale: 84.2%
  • Financial services and fintech: 80.9%
  • SaaS: 77.8%
  • Media and marketing: 69.9%

Where the survey appears matters too. In the same data, surveys opened from a page or a shared link had a median of 86.2%, and surveys shown in a website widget 70.1%. The report does not explain the gap. Part of it is likely who sees each one: a link usually goes to someone who has just finished a purchase or a support case, while a widget is shown to anyone who visits the page.

So before you call a score good or bad, check that the benchmark matches yours on calculation (share or average), scale, the moment you ask (after a support case, an order or at the end of a page), placement (widget or link) and industry. If no outside figure matches, compare your own pages, products or teams with each other.

On article pages, compare pages with each other

CSAT comes from customer service and e-commerce: a rating after a support case or an order. The usual question at the end of an article or docs page is "Was this helpful?", answered Yes or No. The share of Yes answers is calculated like CSAT, but it is a different question, so do not set it against CSAT benchmarks.

We did not find a published CSAT benchmark for article pages. The nearest figures are the media and marketing median and the widget median above, and both mix many kinds of survey. A 1 to 5 rating on an article still shows how strongly readers feel: a page that averages 3.2 tells you something a Yes / No split does not. If you use one, report the share of 4 and 5 answers and the average for each page, and rank pages against each other.

Example: a help centre checks its score

Example

Say you run the help centre for a small accounting app, and every article ends with "How satisfied are you with this article?" on a 1 to 5 scale. Last quarter you had 400 answers: 200 fives, 100 fours, 30 threes, 25 twos and 45 ones.

Your CSAT is 300 out of 400, or 75%, and the average is 3.96. Someone on the team finds a vendor median of 80% and an ACSI industry score and asks whether you are behind.

The ACSI score does not apply: it is an index, not a share. The 80% median mixes link surveys after purchases with widgets on pages, and its widget median is 70.1%. Next to that, 75% is ordinary.

So you compare articles inside your own help centre. Setup articles score 85%. The billing articles, with 100 answers between them, score 55%, and most of the 1s come from there. You read those readers' comments, find that two articles describe an invoice screen that has since changed, and rewrite them.

Six weeks later the billing articles have another 100 answers, at 70%. With 100 answers the margin of error is about 9 points either way, and a change smaller than that is noise. The rise is 15 points, so you count the rewrite as a fix and move on to the next-lowest group of articles.

Where Asklet fits

Asklet shows a short survey on your pages and groups the answers by page path. Its Rating question asks for 1 to 5 stars, and the results show the average and how many answers each star got. It does not report the share of 4 and 5 answers itself: add up the 4s and 5s, or enter the totals in the CSAT calculator.

For the content-page question, a Yes / No first question gives a "found it useful" figure for each page. Answers are anonymous: no cookies, no tracking identifiers and no sign-in for readers.

Your next steps

  1. Put your CSAT formula at the top of every report

    For example: CSAT is the share of 4 and 5 answers to "How satisfied are you with this article?" on a 1 to 5 scale. Put the average beside it.

  2. Strike out benchmarks without a method

    Remove any outside figure that does not say what it counted and divided, and any ACSI score you were setting against a share.

  3. Take a 6-week baseline

    Freeze the question and its placement for 6 weeks, record the score and the number of answers, and compare later periods of the same length with it.

  4. Work out the margin of error before you react

    At a CSAT of 80%, 100 answers give a margin of about 8 points either way; the CSAT calculator works it out for your numbers. Treat a smaller change as noise.

  5. Read the 1s and 2s on your lowest-scoring pages first

    Sort pages by CSAT, take the bottom few, and look for the specific thing readers say is wrong.

Try these steps on your own site. Asklet adds the questions to every page with one snippet. Compare the plans.

Start free

Common questions

Is an ACSI score the same as CSAT? No. An ACSI score is a 0 to 100 index built from a weighted average of three questions answered on a 1 to 10 scale, while a CSAT percentage is the share of satisfied answers. An ACSI score of 75 does not mean 75% of customers were satisfied.

Is CSAT the same as the average rating? Not usually. The common CSAT is the share of answers that are 4 or 5, but some tools report the average out of 5 instead. The same answers can give a CSAT of 80% and an average of 4.1.

What is a good CSAT score for a website or an article? There is no published benchmark for articles that we could verify. In Survicate's 2025 data, surveys shown in a website widget had a median of 70.1%, and media and marketing companies 69.9%. On content pages, a Yes / No "Was this helpful?" question is more common than CSAT.

Should I use CSAT or CES? CSAT asks how satisfied someone was with one moment; CES, the customer effort score, asks how easy a task was. Use CES after a task such as setup or checkout, and CSAT after an interaction such as a support reply.

Sources

More from the blog

Get your first answers today.

Set-up takes a few minutes, and the free plan covers one website or app.

en